Illegal file sharing has cost the recording industry thousands of jobs. Musicians are denied millions in royalties. This does not even consider illegal file sharing of movies, television shows and software. As with any crime, the only winner is the criminal. Thieves take the property of others without permission, and use it for their own gain. Nobody else wins with illegal file sharing. The negative consequences of illegal file sharing demand that action to be taken to curtail it.
In order to stop such criminal behavior, an effective deterrent is required. The actions of the recording industry have reduced illegal file sharing, but it has not stopped it. People are still sharing files illegally. They do so through file-sharing services like Soul Seek or LimeWire or through BitTorrent sites. Clearly, the current approach of dealing with the issue through civil lawsuits is not acting as a deterrent to a degree that protects intellectual property rights and staunches the negative financial impacts on the recording industry. The more effective deterrent would be criminal prosecution. Chronic file sharers would be subject to felony theft charges, given the dollar value attached to their crimes. This would bring to them the threat of hard jail time. When the specter of jail time is compared with the slap on the wrist these criminals will receive when they are sued, the deterrent value of criminal prosecution is obvious.
In addition to the legal and ethical considerations, there is also a strong economic case to be made in support of governmental prosecution of illegal file sharers. Record companies have seen a decline in profits and been forced to lay off workers. The decline in profits hurts shareholders, which includes mutual funds and pension plans that are owned by a wide cross-section of Americans. The five thousand lost jobs represent five thousand people who can no longer pay taxes. Without jobs they are unable to make a significant contribution to the economy with their purchases. When they find new jobs, the new jobs are likely to pay less, putting these workers into the ranks of the underemployed. Another financial consequence of not prosecuting file sharers is that the rule of law is lessened. Other companies...
..for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research" was a more important right to protect under Fair Use Doctrine (Liebowitz, 1985, p.4). Freedom of access to information was more important, and creating an unregulated market environment of ideas. Granted, file sharing is not always used for such a legitimate purpose, but then again, neither were 'taped' VHS movies and programs. While
Downloadable, inexpensive music gives more power to listeners they had during the CD age, in which CDs were getting increasingly expensive, and consumers felt forced to purchase them, even if they liked only a few songs on the album. Technology can be empowering. The music industry did have a point: the nature of downloadable music is not like a cassette tape or VHS, given the ease of recording and mass
So who is an American and what an America can or cannot do are questions which are critical to the issue of legalizing immigrants. Does being an American mean you cannot show allegiance to any other country? The images of people raising and waving Mexican flag had enraged many but it need not have. It should be accepted that people who come from different countries would forever hold in their
This is in part due to the fact that they have more control over this income than they do the income from CDs. For most artists, CDs are a means to increase exposure, driving revenues from these other streams. There is a growing body of anecdotal evidence that file sharing builds exposure (Ian, 2002). Essentially, file sharing is replacing much of the function of the recording industry. Artists are able
It was good news. But it was bad news to healthcare providers in areas with large populations of alien immigrants. The benefits did not link up with the funding employers or the government to pay for the benefits. It did not offer enough incentives for the choice of a healthy lifestyle or the available health care services. It needed to simplify administrative procedures. It relied too much on government
Downloading Music Many college students have strong opinions about whether they should be able to download music for free from the Internet. The issue was brought to a head when musicians sued Napster for providing the means to violate their copyright by distributing their music for free, which meant that the musicians would get no royalty for the music. Napster designed an application that made it easy for people to share
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now